The MCC Study Quality Trailblazer Work Group was formed in 2016 as a collaborative group to work on metrics and tools. The aim is to demonstrate that investing time and resources up front can yield higher quality clinical study performance at a lower cost than fixing quality issues during the study.The MCC Study Quality Trailblazer Group has developed an easy-to-use, Excel®-based tool that enables users to assess operational complexity of implementing a particular protocol and scores each protocol as a low, moderate or high. This is determined from the perspective of subjects, sites and the study. It pulls from public sources – such as reports on the impact of the number of unique procedures in a protocol – and knowledge of MCC member organizations.
- Identify and address complexity to subjects, sites and study before protocol approval
- Increase likelihood of successful implementation of a protocol
- Potentially reduce study timelines
- Decrease burden on sites and study subjects
- Allow fair comparisons of performance data between studies and sites
- Improve the richness of data for site selection
How it works
The tool includes 20 elements from Vendors and Lab Sampling to Visit Burden and Subject Population. Each element is linked to one or more of the subject, site and study dimensions of operational complexity. Visit Burden, for example, is linked to subject, site and study whereas Vendors is linked only to the study dimension. The user scores each element for a particular protocol implementation as low, moderate or high complexity. There is guidance to help determine the level for each element. The tool uses these scores to provide an overall score for the protocol in the three dimensions.
Representatives of MCC member organizations are invited to log in to the MCC site to download the tool.