Metrics

Topic: Metrics

MCC Article Urges Industry to Standardize Data Entry Metric Definition and Use Performance Data to Improve Data Entry Compliance

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

Linda Sullivan, MCC President, and Keith Dorricott, MCC Ambassador - discussed the results of the 2016 MCC Site Data Entry Practices Survey in their article “Importance of Data Entry Timeliness” published by Applied Clinical Trials. The article reveals that organizations consider timely data entry to be very important but face challenges with measuring and monitoring the data input process. A newly released MCC Industry Practices Insight Report, “Clinical Trial Site Data Entry Study: An examination of how organizations measure site data entry cycle times, performance expectations compared to actual results and site management strategies” provides industry’s perspective on the cycle time from subject visit to data entry by investigative sites, and how organizations use the performance data to improve data entry compliance.

About the Survey

MCC conducted the 28 question, web-based survey between June – August 2016. There were 35 respondents primarily from sponsors and Contract Research Organizations (CROs) both large and small. For more information on purchasing this and other MCC Industry Practices Insight Reports, please email Customer Service or visit our Industry Practices Insights Report Page

Read Linda Sullivan and Keith Dorricott’s article on Applied Clinical Trials Online

Performance Metrics: New eLearning Course Allows You to Go Beyond the Basics

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

MCC introduces a new eLearning course, Performance Metrics: Developing Effective Metrics Using a Structured Process that offers industry professionals a deeper understanding of how to select and use performance metrics to support a company's strategic goals.

Using case study examples and easy-to-use worksheets, professionals will learn to use the MCC Metric Development Framework to establish metrics that align with each level of responsibility in your organization and support program goals and objectives. This easy to follow approach includes the following features:
  • Utilizing processes map to identify control points for metrics
  • Establishing critical success factors
  • Prioritizing key performance questions
  • Defining metrics that answer the key performance questions
  • Reporting metric results in formats that facilitate answering the key performance questions

The price of this course is $560* for members and $699 for non-members. There is also accreditation for 2 hours of CEUs accepted by ACRP and SoCRA.

* Discount code needed. For questions please contact Customer Service

Site Data Entry Cycle Time Definitions Vary and Actual Values Exceed Expectations Undermining Risk-based Study Quality Monitoring

Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Boston, MA. April 05, 2017 - Metrics Champion Consortium (MCC)—a trusted partner in the clinical trials industry—announced today a newly published MCC Industry Practices Insight Report, “Clinical Trial Site Data Entry Study: An examination of how organizations measure site data entry cycle times, performance expectations compared to actual results and site management strategies” revealing that organizations consider this to be a very important metric. The report features twenty exhibits highlighting the following key findings:
  • Organizations encourage timely data entry to identify safety signals early and increase data quality.
  • Industry lacks agreement on how to define the “data entry complete” time point – data entry “complete” when a single data point for the visit has been entered into EDC and data entry “complete” when all data for a complete visit have been entered into EDC are most prevalent responses
  • Site data entry cycle time expectations for “single data” time point group not significantly different from “all data” entered group
  • Some organizations cite challenges with measuring data entry cycle time related to EDC system constraints.

“With the adoption of the ICH E6 (R2) Addendum and the increasing focus on risk management in clinical trials, timely data entry by sites following subject visits is becoming more important,” said Linda Sullivan, co-founder and president at the industry group Metrics Champion Consortium, author of the new report. “Delayed data entry can lead to increased risk both to subjects and the trial. This study shines light on a real industry gap that could itself be a significant source of risk unless urgently addressed. It’s time for the industry to come together across the value chain to resolve the definition, use, expectations and continuous improvement of this important cycle time metric.”

MCC conducted the 28 question, web-based survey between June – August 2016. There were 35 respondents primarily from sponsors and Contract Research Organizations (CROs) both large and small. For more information on purchasing the MCC Industry Practices Insight Report, “Clinical Trial Site Data Entry Study: An examination of how organizations measure site data entry cycle times, performance expectations compared to actual results and site management strategies”, please email customerservice@metricschampion.org or visit http://metricschampion.org/sitedataentrystudy/

About Metrics Champion Consortium (MCC)

MCC—a trusted partner in the clinical trials industry—identifies what to measure, how to assess the crucial components of what is changing and how the industry is responding to address these changes to make improvements. MCC continually brings you new insights into the leading trends within the industry. For more information about MCC metric sets and tools, metric education programs and how you can participate in MCC work groups, please visit http://www.metricschampion.org

Contact:
Linda Sullivan
lsullivan@metricschampion.org
317-622-0266

What are the best MCC Performance Metrics for assessing Vendor Performance?

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

MCC is launching a Vendor Oversight work group on March 1st to review and revise MCC Performance Metrics for assessing vendor performance. This new work group will focus on reviewing previously defined metrics related to business operations, clinical operations and quality. The group will also consider the impact of ICH E6 (R2) on these metrics, modifying and adding to the MCC Performance Metrics as needed.

Planned outputs for the group include agreeing on the scope of vendor management, identifying Critical Success Factors and Key Performance Questions, and developing basic and advanced sets of MCC Performance Metrics. The meetings will be held the first Wednesday of the month from 10-11am. Work group meetings are open to all MCC members and registration links can be found on the member portal.

To find out more about the Vendor Oversight group, view the work group page by clicking HERE.

MCC President Linda Sullivan shares insights related to ICH-GCP E6(R2) in Clinical Informatics News Article

Friday, February 17, 2017

Linda Sullivan shared her insights on the major updates to the International Guidelines for Clinical Trials in an article entitled “New GCP R2 Guideline Emphasizes Risk Management Through People, Process, And Technology” by Ann Neuer posted in Clinical Informatics News. Linda speaks on how the new update supports organizations moving to tracking and reporting critical data rather than meaningless data in clinical trials. Click here to read the full article.

Do You Quantify the Cost of Poor Quality at Your Organization?

Monday, February 13, 2017

MCC's Study Quality Trailblazer Work Group met for their monthly meeting on Wednesday February 8th. The main topic of this meeting was the cost of poor quality. Points of discussion included:

  • Developing strategies to support and successfully implement study quality improvement practices
  • Focusing on adopting pre-study start-up practices to improve Protocol Quality and Risk Management
  • Learning the ‘Formula for Cost of Poor Quality’
  • The tools available to help your organization deal with the cost of poor quality
MCC Study Quality Trailblazer group meets every 2nd Wednesday of the month. Our focus is on adopting pre-study startup practices that improve Protocol Quality and Risk Management and working together to support piloting of quality improvement initiatives. To learn more about the MCC Study Quality Trailblazer Work Group,click here
REMINDER: Please note that this Work Group is open to MCC members only. If you are a MCC member and wish to register, log onto the MCC Member Portal to obtain the registration link or contact Customer Service for assistance.

To learn more about membership options or to register to become a member of the MCC, please click here or contact Teresa Holland for assistance.

MCC Special QM Webinar, “How Regulators are Supporting the Quality Management and Risk Based Procedures in ICH GCP E6 (R2)” featuring guest speaker Ann Meeker-O’Connell, Former FDA Director of the Division of GCP Compliance.

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

The International Conference on Harmonisation’s R2 addendum to the ICH E6 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) provides direction on a new approach to clinical monitoring and trial management that requires the use of centralized, quality risk management (QRM) throughout a clinical trial. Sponsors and CROs that are adapting to the changes are approaching this in a variety of ways. That leads to the question, what will regulators expect from organizations as they integrate the new guidelines into their SOPs? The presentation on January 11th , open to all MCC members, focused on the processes and behaviors that the FDA and other regulators are promoting through the quality management and risk-based guidance in ICH-E6(R2) section 5.0 Quality Management. This should be of interest to all organizations whether you have already integrated the changes into your practices or are just starting to plan for the integration.

MCC Members can access this and other Subject Matter Expert Webinars by clicking the Member Login link and going to the MCC Initiative Updates section of the Member Homepage. Scroll down and click on the SME Webinars link.

Please contact Linda Sullivan for additional information.

Learn more about membership options and register to become a member of the MCC

For questions about membership options contact MCC Membership Director, Teresa Holland.

Ann Meeker-O’Connell heads Bioresearch Quality and Compliance for Johnson & Johnson’s consumer sector with responsibility for Good Clinical Practice (GCP), Good Laboratory practice (GLP) and Safety Vigilance oversight. Prior to J&J, Ann served as Director of the Division of Good Clinical Practice Compliance at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). At the FDA, Ann led Agency initiatives related to innovative models for clinical trial conduct and oversight, advised on clinical trial policy and regulation development, and oversaw FDA’s GCP collaboration with European Medicines Agency (EMA). Ann earned her Bachelor's in Biological Anthropology and Anatomy and a Master of Science in Pharmacology from Duke University in Durham, NC.

MCC Co-Founder & President Linda Sullivan Featured in Applied Clinical Trials’ New eBook on RBM

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

ACT eBook Linda Sullivan’s article “Standardized Metrics for RBM” is now featured in Applied Clinical Trials’ new 5th edition eBook Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: A Focus on Quality Risk Assessment, Management and Planning. The article which focuses on the adoption of standardized cost and quality performance metrics to track and predict performance is featured among several other articles by various authorities in the field of clinical trials that together address questions such as:
  • Have the roles of the monitor advanced?
  • How are CRAs accepting the change?
  • How is pharma implementing RBM—is it more remote, centralized or a combination?
  • How important is eSource to RBM?
Download Applied Clinical Trials’ New eBook
Purchase MCC’s New RBM Survey Report

MCC eCOA Performance Metrics Set v1.0 Now Available

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

MCC member companies have developed an initial set of eCOA Metrics to measure the quality, timeliness and effectiveness of their setup, use and closeout of eCOA services. Utilization of these metrics will enable organizations to understand how well the process is being executed and managed throughout study start-up, conduct and closeout. The eCOA metric set and a number of supporting reference tools are available to MCC members.

MCC eCOA Performance Metrics v1.0 At-A-Glance

MCC Performance Metrics

An overview presentation of the metrics was recorded and has been posted on the MCC Members Website.

Presentation Outline

  • Background – MCC eCOA Working Group Purpose, Deliverables and Approach
  • Overview of MCC Metrics Development Model
  • Overview of the eCOA Critical Success Factors
  • Overview of the eCOA Map
  • Overview of the Key Performance Questions
  • Overview of the eCOA Performance Metrics

eCOA Performance Assets Available to Download from the MCC Member Website

  • A recorded eCOA Basics Webinar
  • Recorded eCOA Overview Presentation
  • eCOA Metrics Process Map
  • Detailed MCC eCOA Performance Metric Definitions (Wiki Terms are included with the metrics definitions)

MCC Members can access all of these resources by clicking the Member Login link and going to the Existing Metric Sets section of the website. Scroll down to the table of existing metric sets.

Please contact Linda Sullivan for additional information.

Learn more about membership options and register to become a member of the MCC

For questions about membership options contact MCC Membership Director, Teresa Holland.

CluePoints Partners with Metrics Champion Consortium to Define Metrics and Standards for Centralized Monitoring

Monday, November 7, 2016

CluePoints

Cambridge, MA - CluePoints, a leading provider of Centralized Statistical Monitoring (CSM) and Risk-Based Monitoring (RBM) solutions for clinical trials, announces its partnership with the Metrics Champion Consortium (MCC), an association dedicated to the development of standardized performance metrics to improve clinical trials. Drawing on the company’s vast expertise in Risk-Based Monitoring, CluePoints will work with the consortium to help drive collaboration in the development of a standardized framework for Central Monitoring, including identification and definition of what is included, who should be involved, and how best to manage the process.

“We are excited to have the opportunity to lead such an important initiative for the Metrics Champion Consortium” comments Steve Young, Senior Vice President of US Operations at CluePoints. “The industry is finally beginning to move forward to large scale adoption of RBM, yet there remain many questions on the topic of Central Monitoring, and so we look forward to driving clear guidance and standards for this critical component of RBM success.”

The Metrics Champion Consortium has created the Central Monitoring work group to help facilitate the exchange of knowledge and expertise in standardization of clinical risk management. Known for organizing work groups with the intention of providing metrics for the clinical trials industry, MCC has engaged CluePoints to work with them to more clearly define what Central Monitoring is for the industry.

“We are delighted that CluePoints will lead our Central Monitoring work group” comments Linda Sullivan, Co-Founder and President of Metrics Champion Consortium. “Results from our recent Risk-based Approaches to Monitoring Industry Survey show an increasing number of organizations use/plan to use central monitoring approaches in the next 12 months as compared to two years ago. This new MCC work group will bring sponsors, CROs, central & core labs, consultants and IT system vendors together to explore what key risk indicators, performance metrics and data should be included in central monitoring, what analytic approaches should be used to gain valuable insights and how organizations should use the insights to ensure patient safety and improve data quality. CluePoints’ experience with centralized monitoring and risk-based monitoring make the company ideally placed to bring the community together to share insights and align thinking to established, shared global standards.”

About CluePoints

CluePoints® is a Risk-Based Monitoring and Central Statistical Monitoring solution that has been designed and perfected over the last 10 years. It employs unique statistical algorithms to determine the quality, accuracy, and integrity of clinical trial data both during and after study conduct. Aligned with guidance from the FDA and EMA, CluePoints® is deployed to support traditional on-site monitoring and to drive a risk-based monitoring strategy. The value of using CluePoints® lies in its powerful and timely ability to identify anomalous data and site errors allowing improvement in clinical data quality, optimization of on-site monitoring and a significant reduction in overall regulatory submission risk.

For further information on CluePoints' solutions, please visit www.cluepoints.com

Media contact

Patrick Hughes - Chief Commercial Officer, CluePoints
Patrick.Hughes@CluePoints.com
+44 (0) 7703 532 749

About the Metrics Champion Consortium

MCC—a trusted partner in the clinical trials industry—identifies what to measure, how to assess the critical components of what is changing and how the industry is responding to address the changes to make improvements. MCC continually brings you new insights into the leading trends within the industry.

For more information about MCC publications, metric sets & tools, metric education programs and how you can participate in future surveys and MCC work groups, please visit http://www.metricschampion.org

Contact:

Linda B. Sullivan – President, Metrics Champion Consortium
Lsullivan@metricschampion.org
1.317.622.0266 ext 102